WAXCHAIN
0x8a11F5C6Ba18Bf9679F208DD5cB926DE266E1bb5 0x8a11...6E1bb5

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

WAXCHAIN is not just about a token but about building a comprehensive ecosystem that supports secure, efficient, profitable, and entertaining digital communications.

Contract address
0x8a11...6E1bb5
Network Binance Smart Chain
License MIT
Compiler v0.8.18 v0.8.18+commit.87f61d96
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2024/03/20
Revision date 2024/03/22
Critical
Passed

Owner privileges

Crucial issues found The contract does contain issues of high or medium criticality. In some circumstances, the Contract may not function as intended and may pose a safety risk.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The owner can start and end the presale in the contract.
  • The owner can set any arbitrary value as the price of the token.
  • The owner can set any arbitrary value as the price of a dollar in bnb.
  • The owner can pause the presale.
  • The owner can enable/disable claim functionality in the contract.
  • The owner can transfer contract balance to his wallet.
  • The owner can claim the stuck tokens including contract's tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the WAXCHAIN smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the WAXCHAIN team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

34

State variables
public

12

Total lines
of code

465

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

high Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

The owner can manipulate the price of token.

WAXCHAIN.sol

L442-444

L447-449

Description

The owner can set any arbitrary value as the price of token in bnb and dollar which is not recommended as this can manipulate the price of tokens. Instead of making it manually, add the functionality to have the price of tokens and according to that the price will be pegged with USDT or BNB in the contract.

medium Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

The owner can lock token.

WAXCHAIN.sol

L454-456

Description

The owner can enable/disable the claim functionality from the contract which is not recommended as this can lock the user funds for an unlimited period of time. It is recommended that the claimed functionality should not be locked in the contract.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Floating pragma solidity version

WAXCHAIN.sol

L12

Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

WAXCHAIN.sol

L58-60

L247-263

Description

Remove unused functions.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

WAXCHAIN.sol

L100-102

L104-107

L141-143

L149-151

L159-161

L164-166

L169-173

L180-184

L186-191

L194-198

L200-209

L331-389

L390-424

L433-435

L437-439

L442-444

L447-449

L451-453

L458-460

L462-464

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.