RATHEPAY Info

Rathepay Token (RPX) is a BEP20 utility token that has been designed to support the use of crypto in day to day payments, we built RPX so as to bridge the gap between digital assets and fiat and to facilitate payments and sending of money.

RATHEPAY Logo

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

On-Chain Insights

Smart Contract Audit

Select the audit
Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0x5746...DA2A
Network BNB Smart Chain - Testnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2023/08/29
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burn function within the contract.

Ownership is renounced

Contract cannot be manipulated by owner functions.

Scope of Work

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.

The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  1. Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  4. Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  5. Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
  6. Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
  7. Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


There are no ownership privileges in the contract.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the RATHEPAY smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the RATHEPAY team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. Moreover, please note that the contract is upgradeable nature and it is possible for the owner in future to upgrade the contract with a new code which may content different logic. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Findings and Audit result

informational Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Disable Initializer
RATHEPAY.sol
LN/A
Description

If the owner updates the contract, a disableInitializer call in the constructor must be implemented. This prevents calling the initialize function again to set the state variables in the contract. This should be implemented only if the contract was deployed before. Otherwise, the owner cannot call the initialize function to set the variables.