CBAI
0xbCf7fe54cB26F5de09360EBE87C1F1b8959625aB 0xbCf7...9625aB

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

CryptoBotsAI recognizes a significant gap within the cryptocurrency industry—a need for a cohesive and all-encompassing framework. This framework aims to consolidate various functionalities, tools, and resources under one roof. By doing so, it streamlines the often complex and disjointed processes that investors and stakeholders face in the cryptocurrency space.

Contract address
0xbCf7...9625aB
Network Binance Smart Chain
License
Compiler v0.8.17 v0.8.17+commit.8df45f5f
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/12/11
Revision date 2023/12/11
Critical
Passed
High
Passed

Owner privileges

Crucial issues found The contract does contain issues of high or medium criticality. In some circumstances, the Contract may not function as intended and may pose a safety risk.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The owner can exclude wallets from fees.
  • The owner can set a minimum swap amount of not less than 0.0001% of the total supply.
  • The owner can update the marketing wallet address.
  • The owner can update the max transaction amount of not less than 0.1% of the total supply.
  • The owner can update the max wallet amount of not less than 1% of the total supply.
  • The owner can set a sum of sell, burn, and transfer fees of not more than 10%.
  • The owner can enable trading only once.
  • The owner can claim stuck tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the CBAI smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the CBAI team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

medium Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Transfer of tokens without enabling trade.

CBAI.sol

L155-242

Description

The trading needs to be enabled by the owner in order for regular users to transfer tokens. On the contrary, the owner can authorize addresses manually and those addresses will be able to trade tokens. This functionality can be exploited in the following way, For example, there is a presale and the wallets used for the presale can be authorized by the owner. All the tokens obtained can be consolidated into a final wallet address and facilitate trading and selling of the acquired tokens, the last wallet address can be authorized.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Floating pragma solidity version

CBAI.sol

L3

Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing visibility

CBAI.sol

L35

Description

It is recommended to add 'public' or 'private' visibility during the declaration or initialization of a state variable or a mapping.

Pending

#3 Issue

Remove unused modifier

CBAI.sol

L50-56

Description

It is recommended that unused codes be removed from the contract.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Remove unused code

Context.sol

L21-23

Description

Remove unused functions from the contract.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

ERC20.sol

L62-64

L70-72

L87-89

L94-96

L101-103

L113-117

L122-124

L136-140

L158-163

L177-181

L197-206

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.