Baked Pizza
0xaEf10dd120e79f60d61048c306b7379c21d56A38 0xaEf1...d56A38

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

The Leading DeFi on Binance Smart Chain up to 10% daily return and 15% referral bonus Fully Verified and Audited Contract. Pizza does not have a set price. Higher TVL, more Pizza per BNB. Lower TVL, less Pizza. This creates a level playing field so no user can be late. There is NO calculator available to work this out.

Contract address
0xaEf1...d56A38
Network Binance Smart Chain
License None
Compiler v0.4.26 v0.4.26+commit.4563c3fc
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/08/07
Revision date 2023/08/07
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed

Owner privileges

No crucial issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The ceoAddress cannot set the marketEggs value after initiation.
  • The withdrawal and deposit fee is sent to ceoAddress. 
  • The bakePizza function will auto-reinvest some amount of tokens which will be calculated according to the deposit and withdrawal of tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Baked Pizza smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one contract for the Baked Pizza team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

14

State variables
public

8

Total lines
of code

142

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Old Solidity Version

BakedPizza.sol

L1

Description

When deploying contracts, you should use the latest released version of Solidity. Apart from exceptional cases, only the latest version receives security fixes. Furthermore, breaking changes, as well as new features, are introduced regularly. It is recommended to add the latest solidity version to resolve these issues.

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing error message

BakedPizza.sol

L21

L41

L52

L80

Description

Add a 'require' failed error message.

Pending

#3 Issue

Forced reinvestment

BakedPizza.sol

L51-59

Description

Some amount of tokens will be reinvested back without the users permission. In extreme scenarios, if the percentage of re-investment is high then the user will have to reinvest a high amount of tokens which is not recommended.

Pending

#4 Issue

Missing SPDX License

BakedPizza.sol

L1

Description

There must be a license identifier present in the contract. Add "SPDX-License-Identifier" as SPDX allows the expression of components, licenses, copyrights, security references, and other metadata relating to software.

Pending

#5 Issue

Unused amount after substracting.

BakedPizza.sol

L51-59

Description

The users have to call the "bakePizza" function with an arbitrary amount of BNB. The deposited amount cannot be withdrawn by the sender. The caller has to call the "eatPizza" over and over again to get the ROI. 5% of the msg.value will be sent to the ceoAddress directly and the rest will be deposited in the contract itself. Also, In the bakePizza function there is a devFee(eggsBought) which will substracted from the eggsBought variable. The devFee(eggsBought) amount will never be used after substraction. Using this value is recommended otherwise, remove the devFee(eggsBought) and use the whole eggsBought.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Conformity to Solidity naming conventions (naming-convention)

BakedPizza.sol

L7

L8

L9

Description

Follow the Solidity [naming convention](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.4.25/style-guide.html#naming-conventions).

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)

BakedPizza.sol

L7

L8

L9

Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

BakedPizza.sol

L40-50

L51-59

L72-74

L78-83

L84-86

L87-89

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.