Baked Pizza Info
The Leading DeFi on Binance Smart Chain up to 10% daily return and 15% referral bonus Fully Verified and Audited Contract. Pizza does not have a set price. Higher TVL, more Pizza per BNB. Lower TVL, less Pizza. This creates a level playing field so no user can be late. There is NO calculator available to work this out.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Scope of Work
Files and details
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.
- Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
- Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Findings and Audit result
low Issues | 5 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Old Solidity Version
When deploying contracts, you should use the latest released version of Solidity. Apart from exceptional cases, only the latest version receives security fixes. Furthermore, breaking changes, as well as new features, are introduced regularly. It is recommended to add the latest solidity version to resolve these issues.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing error message
Add a 'require' failed error message.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Forced reinvestment
Some amount of tokens will be reinvested back without the users permission. In extreme scenarios, if the percentage of re-investment is high then the user will have to reinvest a high amount of tokens which is not recommended.
Pending
#4 low Issue
Missing SPDX License
There must be a license identifier present in the contract. Add "SPDX-License-Identifier" as SPDX allows the expression of components, licenses, copyrights, security references, and other metadata relating to software.
Pending
#5 low Issue
Unused amount after substracting.
The users have to call the "bakePizza" function with an arbitrary amount of BNB. The deposited amount cannot be withdrawn by the sender. The caller has to call the "eatPizza" over and over again to get the ROI. 5% of the msg.value will be sent to the ceoAddress directly and the rest will be deposited in the contract itself. Also, In the bakePizza function there is a devFee(eggsBought) which will substracted from the eggsBought variable. The devFee(eggsBought) amount will never be used after substraction. Using this value is recommended otherwise, remove the devFee(eggsBought) and use the whole eggsBought.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Conformity to Solidity naming conventions (naming-convention)
Follow the Solidity [naming convention](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.4.25/style-guide.html#naming-conventions).
Ownership Privileges
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Baked Pizza smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one contract for the Baked Pizza team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.