AIM Info
Welcome to the whimsical world of AIM, where memes aren't just fleeting chuckles on your screen but chatty pals ready for banter! Ever imagined a universe where your favorite meme, be it Doge, Pepe, or Elon, doesn't just make you laugh but actually chats back? Well, pinch yourself because you're not dreaming! In this delightful dimension, the AI Meme coin (AIM) isn't just another cryptocurrency; it's the heart and soul of meme magic. Crafted with the finesse of the Ethereum blockchain (that's right, the big league!)
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Scope of Work
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- The owner can buy tokens for the users.
- The owner can change the fund wallet address.
- The owner can start presale only once.
- The owner can start the claim manually.
- The user will only be able to claim the tokens once the claim is started manually by the owner.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the AIM Presale smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the AIM team; our team did not audit other contracts associated with the project. We recommend investors to do their own research before investing. The presale is going to be launched on a private platform so it is recommended to do the research before investing.
Files and details
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Owner will start claim manually.
The owner of the contract will start the claim functionality manually in this contract, which can lock the tokens for an indefinite period of time and it is not recommended. There must be some functionality in the contract where the token claim will be started automatically, and no centralization would be required for it.
Pending
#2 medium Issue
Missing 'require' check (Potential honeypot)
The owner of the contract can add any arbitrary address as the fund wallet address excluding zero. This can be an issue if the fund wallet address is set to a contract address which cannot receive ETH. Therefore, It is recommended to add a 'require' check that the fund wallet address cannot be set to a contract address.
optimization Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.