Zynk Protocol
0x971791fF62d24416e9dA7d2548d9399A93783169 0x9717...783169

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

Zynk Protocol is a DeFi Company that integrates futuristic blockchain technology to provide a comprehensive ecosystem. Our goal is to build innovative and disruptive DeFi utilities such as Bridges, Wallets, NFTs, Dapps, and Swaps, among others. We aspire to revolutionize the industry and become the go-to platform for all DeFi needs.

Contract address
0x9717...783169
Network Binance Smart Chain
License Unlicense
Compiler v0.8.19 v0.8.19+commit.7dd6d404
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/03/09
Revision date 2023/03/16
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed

Owner privileges

No crucial issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges:

  • Update liquidity providing state
  • Update liquidity threshold
  • Enable trading but cannot disable it
  • Update tax but can only set it to a pre-defined value with a maximum of 5 %
  • Update deadline but it must be less than 5 blocks
  • Update dev and marketing wallet
  • Include/Exclude wallets from the fee
  • Withdraw ETH and other tokens from the contract but not the native ones

We recommend investors/users do their own research before investing

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

49

State variables
public

12

Total lines
of code

770

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L700-703

L733-737

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#2 Issue

Modifiers that can return the default value (incorrect-modifier)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L480-486

Description

All the paths in a modifier must execute `_` or revert.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L23-26

Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 Issue

Unused return values (unused-return)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L681-694

Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Pending

#3 Issue

Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L580

L577

L578

Description

Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L463

Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

ZynkProtocol.sol

L104-106

L112-114

L136-138

L161-169

L174-182

L191-199

L214-229

L243-254

L270-283

L394-396

L398-404

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.