TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io,
is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burning within the contract without any allowances
Ownership is not renounced
The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- Set maximum buy and sell amount
- Enable/Disable airdrop, swap and wallet limits
- Set the wallet limit to any arbitrary value, including zero, which may result in the lock of user funds when the wallet limit is enabled.
- Set buy and sell fees up to 25%
- Include/Exclude wallets from fees and rewards
- Set the Fund Wallet Address
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the XKX Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the XKX team; our team did not audit other contracts associated with the project. We recommend investors to do their own research before investing.
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Owner can lock user funds
The contract owner can set the maximum wallet limit to any arbitrary value, including zero. If done so, user funds will be locked
Pending
#2 medium Issue
Liquidity is Credited to an EOA
The contract's liquidity is automatically added to the 'fund' address, which is not recommended because, in an extreme scenario, this can be used to drain liquidity from the contract.
low Issues | 3 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Uninitialized local variables
Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Unused return values
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.