Vaselabs Info

Vaselabs is a multichain ecosystem within the blockchain industry. This means that Vaselabs products aren't confined to a single blockchain network; instead, they operate across multiple blockchain platforms.

Vaselabs Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

11.09
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0x27c7...7a93
Network
BNB Smart Chain - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2024/02/16
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner can mint

It is possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner can blacklist addresses

It is possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Token transfer can be locked

Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.

Token can be burned

There is a function to burn tokens in the contract without any allowances.

Ownership is not renounced

The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The owner can pause and un-pause the token transfer for an unlimited period.
  • The owner can blacklist/un-blacklist the user from transferring tokens.
  • The owner can burn tokens from the blacklisted wallets.
  • The owner can claim stuck tokens including the contract tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Vaselabs smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Vaselabs team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

high Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 high Issue
The owner can burn tokens.
Vase.sol
L429-435
Description

The owner can burn the tokens from the user's wallets which were blacklisted by the owner as this is not recommended because no burning of tokens should be done without any allowances by the user.

medium Issues | 3 findings

Pending

#1 medium Issue
The owner can blacklist wallets.
Vase.sol
L419-422
Description

The owner can blacklist wallets from transferring tokens as this can lock the funds, which is not recommended. There must be a locking period so that the user is not locked for an indefinite period of time.

Pending

#2 medium Issue
The owner can lock funds.
Vase.sol
L370-373
Description

The contract contains the pausable functionality which can pause and unpause the token transfer which is not recommended as there must be a locking period so that the transferring of tokens should not be locked for an indefinite period of time.

Pending

#3 medium Issue
The owner can mint tokens.
Vase.sol
L585-588
Description

The owner can mint an unlimited amount of tokens after the initial deployment, which is not recommended as this can increase the supply of tokens, which can manipulate the cost. There must be a fixed supply so that the token supply should not be changed after initial deployment.

low Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Floating pragma solidity version.
Vase.sol
L2
Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Remove safemath library
Vase.sol
L133-267
Description

The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.

optimization Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Vase.sol
L317-320
L326-328
L370-373
L378-381
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

informational Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Vase.sol
L114-117
Description

Remove unused functions.