Twenty4Seven Info

Nine 2 Five is set to introduce their very own token, T4S, enhancing their forex investment offerings by introducing staking pools, telegram games, and introducing a new type of tokenomics in Defi we named Trade-And-Burn.

Twenty4Seven Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

38.32
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0x4cb1...fcD7
Network
BNB Smart Chain - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2023/06/23
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burning within the contract without any allowances

Ownership is not renounced

The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • Include/Exclude wallets from fees
  • Enable/Disable swap and Swapback in the contract
  • Update buy and sell fees, but cannot set it above 6%
  • Enable Trading but cannot disable it.
  • Set AMM pair address, marketing wallet, dev wallet, buyback wallet address

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Twenty4Seven Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Twenty4Seven team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors to do their research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

medium Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 medium Issue
Owner needs to Enable Trading
Twenty4Seven.sol
L1071
Description

The trading needs to be enabled by the owner in order for regular users to transfer tokens. On the contrary, the owner can exclude addresses from the fees manually and those addresses will be able to trade tokens. This functionality can be exploited in the following way, For example, there is a presale and the wallets used for the presale can be excluded from fees by the owner. All the tokens obtained can be consolidated into a final wallet address and facilitate trading and selling of the acquired tokens, the last wallet address can be excluded from fees.

low Issues | 3 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L928
L932
Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L1009-1016
L1018-1025
Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L1044
L1049
L1054
Description

Check that the address is not zero.

optimization Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L209-211
L217-219
L234-236
L241-243
L260-263
L268-270
L279-282
L297-305
L319-322
L338-341
L618-620
L637-640
L1174-1179
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

informational Issues | 4 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L14-17
L402-410
L579-581
L595-598
L703-706
L694-698
L674-680
L662-669
L685-689
L709-712
L716-720
Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 informational Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L657
Description

Remove unused state variables.

Pending

#3 informational Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L1159-1172
Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Pending

#4 informational Issue
Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)
Twenty4Seven.sol
L951
Description

Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.