Trust AI Info
The emergence of artificial intelligence has significantly impacted multiple facets of our daily existence, with the cryptocurrency market being no exception. By seamlessly amalgamating AI with market dynamics, we can unlock a plethora of advantages and streamline the intricate demands it entails. From streamlining the process of contract creation and validating non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to optimizing trade executions through automated swap platforms, AI infuses operational efficiency and user convenience.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Scope of Work
Files and details
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.
- Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
- Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Findings and Audit result
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
Ownership Privileges
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Trust AI smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Trust AI team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.