Tora Inu Info
Tora Inu smart contract is designed to burns tokens out of circulation after every single transaction creating bullish sentiment and a supply / demand squeeze. Furthermore, you receive redistribution in $TORA rewards directly to your wallet from every transaction.
TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io,
is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner can set high fees
Contract owner is able to set fees above 25%. Very high fees can also prevent token transfer.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burning within the contract without any allowances
Ownership is not renounced
The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
- Fees can be set above 100%
- liquidity will be added to the owner.
- Beware of it because the owner is able to drain out the liquidity
- deliver function cannot be called by an address that is excluded
- Owner can lock user funds by
- setting too high fees in the contract
- setting "_maxTxAmount" to 0
- The owner is able
- to transfer tokens from address to arbitrary address with "migrateToken" function
- Beware of it
- change the marketing fee address to his own and take the fees
- to transfer tokens from address to arbitrary address with "migrateToken" function
- Tokens will be burned upon the reflection
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Regain ownership
The owner is able to regain the ownership after transferring the ownership to another address. What the owner has to do is only to call the "lock" function to setup the "_previousOwner" variable and after transferring the ownership the owner can call "unlock" function because he's still set as "_previousOwner". We recommend to set back the "_previousOwner" to address 0 after unlocking.
low Issues | 4 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#4 low Issue
Floating pragma
We recommend you to use a certain pragma version instead of floating. Also we recommend you to use at least version 0.8.x for deployment.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.