The Dare
0xa84A264d68061E8e0C969A03cCdaDDBFA3cb59aE 0xa84A...cb59aE

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

“The Dare Experience,” a virtual reality simulation that promises to be the most terrifying experience of your life. But before you can enter the simulation, you’re required to take a personality test. The results are then analyzed by artificial intelligence, to create a scenario tailored specifically to you.

Contract address
0xa84A...cb59aE
Network Arbitrum
License None
Compiler v0.8.17 v0.8.17+commit.8df45f5f
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/03/06
Revision date 2023/03/07
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed

Owner privileges

No critical issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ethereum network: https://etherscan.io/address/0xa8e580fb453378429f6527254abf299c1e74ca97

Owner Privileges

  • Enable/disable providingLiquidity
  • ToggleTaxes
    • This function set all taxes to 0
  • enable trading
  • updating
    • marketingWallet
    • dev wallet
    • tokenLiquidityThreshold
      • below 1e5
  • exempt addresses
  • rescue bnb
  • rescue tokens

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

44

State variables
public

11

Total lines
of code

718

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to specification and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

TheDare.sol

L669-672

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

TheDare.sol

L11-14

Description

Remove unused functions.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

TheDare.sol

L92-94

L100-102

L124-126

L149-157

L162-170

L179-187

L202-217

L231-242

L258-271

L382-384

L386-392

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.