Snoopy Info
Snoopy Introduction Meet the legendary Snoopy! This beloved beagle has captured hearts worldwide with his charm and mischievous spirit. Now, get ready to embark on a thrilling adventure as Snoopy takes the spotlight in the exciting realm of Snoopy Token. Join us for a world of laughter, friendship, and endless possibilities. Get ready to experience the magic of Snoopy's universe like never before.

TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
TrustNet DataPulse
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner can blacklist addresses
It is possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- Include/Exclude wallets from the max transaction limit, maximum holding limit, and the bots list (blacklist functionality)
- Set the maximum holding and transaction limit, and they must be greater than 0.1% of the total supply
- Withdraw foreign tokens from the contract, but not the native ones
- Enable Trading but cannot disable it.
Moreover, the funds can be locked by the owner because it is possible to manually add wallets or contracts to the list of bots.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Snoopy Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Snoopy team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors to do their research before investing.
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Owner needs to Enable Trading
The trading needs to be enabled by the owner in order for regular users to transfer tokens. On the contrary, the owner can exclude addresses from the max txn manually and those addresses will be able to trade tokens. This functionality can be exploited in the following way, For example, there is a presale and the wallets used for the presale can be excluded from max txn by the owner. All the tokens obtained can be consolidated into a final wallet address and facilitate trading and selling of the acquired tokens, the last wallet address can be excluded from the max txn.
low Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Contract doesn’t import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)
We recommend to import all packages from npm directly without flatten the contract. Functions could be modified or can be susceptible to vulnerabilities
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.