Red Bonk Info

redbonk.online

REDBONK (‘RBONK’) is a digital token deployed on the Binance Smart Chain, adhering to the BEP20 standard. RBONK holds no intrinsic value, utility, or functions and does not promise any financial returns, profits, interest, or dividends.

Red Bonk Logo

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

On-Chain Insights

Smart Contract Audit

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0xB5b5...881b
Network BNB Smart Chain - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2024/02/28
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burn function within the contract.

Ownership is not renounced

Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The owner can claim stuck tokens from the contract including the contract's tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Red Bonk smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Red Bonk team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Scope of Work

Files and details

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.

The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  1. Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  4. Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  5. Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
  6. Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
  7. Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Findings and Audit result

low Issues | 4 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
RedBonk.sol
L75
Description

Check that the address is not zero.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Old compiler version
RedBonk.sol
L6
Description

Adding the constant latest version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Pending

#3 low Issue
Missing 'require' error message
RedBonk.sol
L71
L79
Description

Adding the error message while using the 'require' check inside the function or a modifier in the contract is recommended.

Pending

#4 low Issue
Missing visibility
RedBonk.sol
L97
L98
Description

It is recommended to use access modifiers such as 'public,' 'private,' or 'internal' during the declaration or initialization of a state variable or a mapping in the contract.

optimization Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
RedBonk.sol
L21-24
L25-28
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L53
L75-77
L78-83
L190-195
L201-203
L209-211
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.