Project Dreams Info
Project Dreams aims to educate and bring awareness to decentralized finance by using different platoforms. Project Dreams podcast will host several DeFi project developers, experienced DeFi traders and knowledgeable DeFi individuals to share their experinces within the Defi industry. We connect the community to emerging and existing Defi projects by giving project developers a platform to share the details about their projects. Project Dreams will be launching a token and documenting the whole experience to share with listeners on their podcast. Listeners will get to have a in-depth analysis of what it is like to start their own DeFi project.
Team and KYC Verification
The team has securely submitted their personal information to SolidProof.io for verification.
In the event of any fraudulent activities, this information will be promptly reported to the relevant authorities to ensure accountability and compliance.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Scope of Work
Files and details
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.
- Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
- Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Findings and Audit result
low Issues | 3 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Floating Pragma
The current pragma Solidity directive is “^0.8.0". Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using other versions.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 3 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.
Pending
#3 informational Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
Remove unused state variables.
The owner can authorize/unauthorize multiple accounts/wallets/contract addresses to perform certain actions in the contract and these addresses can perform these actions even after the ownership is renounced.
Authorized Privileges:
OnlyToken Privileges:
The token address will be set as the deployer address of the dividend contract and it can perform certain actions: