Phryges Info

phryges paris olympic mascot, which not only subverts the meme culture but also subverts the global encryption field.

Phryges Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

54.06
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0x96e9...0435
Network
Ethereum - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2024/05/13
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burning within the contract without any allowances

Ownership is renounced

The contract does not include owner functions that allow post-deployment modifications.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The ownership of the token is renounced. Hence, the owner cannot change any contract settings.
  • Any arbitrary address can claim external tokens to the fund address.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Phryges smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Phryges team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

low Issues | 4 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
ERC20.sol
L189
L206
Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
ERC20.sol
L227-239
Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
ERC20.sol
L159
Description

Check that the address is not zero.

Pending

#4 low Issue
Floating pragma solidity version.
ERC20.sol
L7
Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

optimization Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
ERC20.sol
L219
L220
Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
ERC20.sol
L72-74
L81-84
L86-90
L158-162
L176-178
L184-187
L189-191
L193-196
L198-204
L227-239
L242-244
L246-250
L327-329
L374-376
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

informational Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
ERC20.sol
L331-347
Description

Remove unused functions.