MYLA Metaverse
We have as mission to bring source of income and entertainment for all audiences, we believe that a game of E-sports within the Blockchain need to be more than just a game where you earn money with virtually no effort in a way unsustainable with a minimum longevity, we have as a major goal to develop one of the largest multiverse projects that the Blockchain has ever seen and at the same time please all tastes and please investors and players of the Blockchain market, creating bridges facilitators for all possible audiences.
Owner privileges
Comments
Ownership Privileges:
- Exempt accounts from fees and also exempt the fee receiver
- Set developing wallet addreses
- Set buy back and hold, but back and hold with decimals, buy back and burn to any arbitrary amount
- Set WBNB/TOKEN, WBNB/BUSD, pair
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
6
State variables
public
2
Total lines
of code
54
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
0
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
23
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
11
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
355
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
6
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
81
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
3
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
27
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
2
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
10
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
3
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
71
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
0
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
66
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
2
State variables
public
0
Total lines
of code
14
Capabilities
Hover on items
Functions
public
18
State variables
public
10
Total lines
of code
319
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
L65
L66
L314
L315
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#2 Issue
Missing Events
All
Emit events for critical parameter changes. In this case, there are no events in the entire contract.
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
L29-31
L29-31
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.
Diagrams
Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.