MileiMoneda
0xD8c5F7D22BA7D5F282c6Bd3a744bd15aCFea6d2c 0xD8c5...ea6d2c

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

Hello Crypto Aficionados! It’s Milei Moneda Here, the Parody of Disruptor Extraordinaire Javier Milei, Welcome to a Defiant Meme Coin That Throws the Rulebook Out the Window! Brace Yourselves for a Wild Ride as We Fuse Cryptocurrency, Politics, and Blockchain to Forge a Project and Community Like Never Before.

Contract address
0xD8c5...ea6d2c
Network Ethereum Mainnet
License MIT
Compiler v0.8.17 v0.8.17+commit.8df45f5f
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2024/03/25
Revision date 2024/03/25
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed

Owner privileges

No crucial issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The owner can update the minimum swap amount.
  • The owner can enable/disable swapping.
  • The owner can update the automated market maker pair address.
  • The owner can manually transfer tokens to any arbitrary address.
  • The owner can claim the ETH from the contract to the recipient's wallet address.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the MileiMoneda smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the MileiMoneda team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

88

State variables
public

5

Total lines
of code

1111

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to specification and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)

MileiMoneda.sol

L1009

Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 Issue

Remove safemath library

MileiMoneda.sol

L223-422

Description

The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

MileiMoneda.sol

L441-443

L897-913

L394-399

L358-360

L416-421

L328-330

L375-380

L229-235

L271-276

L283-288

L254-264

L242-247

Description

Remove unused functions.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

MileiMoneda.sol

L501-503

L509-512

L682-684

L690-692

L707-709

L733-737

L756-760

L778-783

L797-801

L817-826

L1035-1038

L1040-1043

L1078-1080

L1082-1085

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.