MicroGPT Info

Presenting MicroGPT, a revolutionary platform that aims to completely transform the developer experience. Fundamentally, MicroGPT provides an extensive set of tools that are painstakingly designed to empower developers and expedite their coding experience.

MicroGPT Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

63.40
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

TrustNet DataPulse

Security Assessments

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0x8CED...26d5
Network
Ethereum - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2024/04/23
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner can set high fees

Contract owner is able to set fees above 25%. Very high fees can also prevent token transfer.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burn function within the contract.

Ownership is not renounced

Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The owner can only set the new router address before the liquidity is added.
  • The owner can update the LP pair address.
  • The owner can initialize the token.
  • The owner can exclude/include wallets in limits.
  • The owner can exclude/include wallets in fees.
  • The owner can exclude wallets from protection.
  • The owner can remove sniper accounts.
  • The owner can enable//disable protection settings.
  • The owner can lock taxes.
  • The owner can update the buy, sell, and transfer to not more than 40%.
  • The owner can update the ratios in the contract.
  • The owner can update the marketing, development, and community wallet address.
  • The owner can update the max transaction percentage to not less than 0.5% of the total supply.
  • The owner can update the max wallet amount to not less than 1% of the total supply.
  • The owner can update the minimum swap amount to not less than 0.0001% of the total supply.
  • The owner can update the Piswap percentage to not more than 1.5%.
  • The owner can enable/disable swapping.
  • The owner can enable trading only once.
  • The owner can withdraw ETH from the contract only before the liquidity is added.
  • The owner can claim stuck tokens.
  • The owner can air-drop tokens to multiple wallets at once.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the MicroGPT smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the MicroGPT team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

medium Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 medium Issue
The owner can set fees more than 25%.
MicroGPT.sol
L372-381
Description

The owner can update the buy, sell, and transfer fees up to 40%, which is not recommended as there should not be a very high fee so that the user may not lose his fund's value. It is recommended that the fees in the contract should not be more than 25% in the contract.

Pending

#2 medium Issue
Missing 'require' check.
MicroGPT.sol
L392-398
Description

The owner can update the marketing, development, and community wallet address to any contract address which is not recommended as this can cause the loss of funds if the owner has set the address to a contract address that cannot receive ETH. It is recommended that the wallets should not be added to the contract address that cannot receive ETH.

low Issues | 4 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
MicroGPT.sol
L400-403
L405-408
L422-429
L431-434
Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Local variables used prior their declaration (variable-scope)
MicroGPT.sol
L324
L324
L566
L566
L597
Description

Move all variable declarations prior to any usage of the variable, and ensure that reaching a variable declaration does not depend on some conditional if it is used unconditionally.

Pending

#3 low Issue
Floating pragma solidity version
MicroGPT.sol
L2
Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Pending

#4 low Issue
Missing visibility
MicroGPT.sol
L103
L164
L176
Description

It is recommended to use 'public', 'private', or 'internal' visibility while declaring or initializing the state variable or a mapping.

optimization Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
MicroGPT.sol
L257-260
L320-329
L355-357
L559-572
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.