Matt Pepe
0xb61966Ed7c886b11ffF2D6236c99AAf37079c1C3 0xb619...79c1C3

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

Matt Pepe, the ultimate meme coin, stands proud as a heartfelt tribute to the real father of Pepe, Matt Furie. As the visionary creator of the iconic Pepe the Frog, Matt Furie laid the foundation for a global phenomenon that gave birth to countless internet memes, representing humor, freedom of expression, and unity among diverse communities.

Contract address
0xb619...79c1C3
Network Ethereum Mainnet
License None
Compiler v0.8.18 v0.8.18+commit.87f61d96
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/09/18
Revision date 2023/09/18
Critical
Passed
High
Passed

Owner privileges

Crucial issues found The contract does contain issues of high or medium criticality. In some circumstances, the Contract may not function as intended and may pose a safety risk.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner can blacklist addresses It is possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner can set high fees Contract owner is able to set fees above 25%. Very high fees can also prevent token transfer.
Token transfer can be locked Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The owner can exclude wallets from fees.
  • The owner can set any arbitrary value on the minimum swap amount before swap.
  • The owner can blacklist wallets for an unlimited period of time.
  • The owner can set any arbitrary value into buy and sell tax.
  • The contract balance will be transfer to the marketing wallet(0x002170ae4186aC7402d27F2E3f8a86E6E503E252) after swapping of tokens.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Matt Pepe smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Matt Pepe team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

86

State variables
public

11

Total lines
of code

627

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

medium Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

The owner can blacklist wallets.

MTP.sol

L525-527

Description

The owner can blacklist wallets for an unlimited period of time and then that user will not be able to transfer their tokens to any other wallets which is not recommended.

Pending

#2 Issue

The owner can set fees to more than 100%.

MTP.sol

L529-535

Description

The owner can set buy and sell tax to 100% or more than 100% through this owner can lock the funds and users will not be able to transfer their tokens which is not recommended. No fees should be more than 25% of the contract.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)

MTP.sol

L468

L491

Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

MTP.sol

L503-505

L529-531

L533-535

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 Issue

Floating pragma solidity version

MTP.sol

L2

Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Pending

#4 Issue

Remove Safemath library.

MTP.sol

L28-79

Description

compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow, It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

MTP.sol

L119-136

L102-104

L106-108

L110-112

L114-117

L83-92

L94-100

L10-13

L71-73

L75-78

Description

Remove unused functions.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)

MTP.sol

L378

L376

L377

L382

L380

L402

L401

Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

MTP.sol

L159-162

L164-168

L448-450

L452-454

L456-458

L460-462

L468-470

L472-475

L477-480

L482-484

L486-489

L499-501

L507-509

L514-517

L519-523

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.