MAIGA Info

Maiga.ai is an AI agent platform that provides AI-powered trading signals and alpha insights for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Designed for traders, creators, and speculators, Maiga.ai combines advanced AI framework with real-time data to optimize your DeFi strategies. Powered by ElizaOS AI framework, OpenAI ChatGPT 4o model, on EVM chains (BNB etc), using Google Cloud (GCP), and other leading technologies, Maiga.ai is your go-to solution for navigating the world of DeFi and crypto trading. Currently, Maiga.ai is focusing on MaigaXBT, which is our 1st AI agent on Telegram App that enable users to analyse crypto trading indicators with AI agent and machine learning. This is our 1st of many products in Maiga.ai that will enable retail users and traders to experience with AI agent driven crypto trading & fully automated DeFAI AI agent in future.

MAIGA Logo

Team and KYC Verification

The team has securely submitted their personal information to SolidProof.io for verification.

In the event of any fraudulent activities, this information will be promptly reported to the relevant authorities to ensure accountability and compliance.

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

100.00
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

Select the audit
"Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review"
Contract address
N/A
Network N/A
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2025/05/13
Revision date 2025/05/14

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burning within the contract without any allowances

Ownership is not renounced

The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.

Contract is upgradeable

The contract uses a proxy pattern or similar mechanism, enabling future upgrades. This can introduce risks if the upgrade mechanism is not securely managed.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The admin can update the data.
  • The owner can unlock tokens.
  • The owner can update the unlock rate calculation.
  • The owner can update the Maiga address.
  • The owner can update the max trading volume value to any arbitrary value.
  • The owner can whitelist contract addresses.
  • The owner can update the admin addresses.
  • The owner can upgrade the contract implementation through the _authorizeUpgrade function.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Maiga smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Maiga team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

medium Issues | 2 findings

Resolved

#1 medium Issue
Missing 'isContract' check.
oMaiga.sol
L93-99
L101-103
Description

The contract lacks a validation check to ensure that specific parameters are contract addresses. Without this check, there is a risk that non-contract addresses (such as externally owned accounts, or EOAs) could be mistakenly set for parameters intended to reference other contracts. This could lead to failures in executing critical interactions within the contract, as EOAs do not support contract-specific functions.

Resolved

#2 medium Issue
Unrestricted Modification of Maximum Trading Volume
oMaiga.sol
L105-107
Description

The setMaxTradingVolume function allows the owner to set an arbitrary value for maxTradingVolume without any validation checks, including zero values. This parameter is critical as it directly affects token unlocking rates through division (balanceOf(user) * accumulatedTradingVolume / maxTradingVolume). Setting it to zero would cause all unlock attempts to fail with division-by-zero errors, while manipulating it allows arbitrary acceleration or deceleration of token unlocking rates without notification to users.

low Issues | 1 findings

Resolved

#1 low Issue
Missing MAIGA Token Balance Verification
oMaiga.sol
L77-84
Description

The unlockToken function transfers MAIGA tokens to users without first verifying if the contract has sufficient tokens to fulfill the request. In the line maiga.transfer(msg.sender, availableUnlockToken), the function attempts to transfer tokens based solely on the calculated amount without checking the contract's actual MAIGA balance. This can lead to transactions reverting after state changes have been recorded, causing users to waste gas on failed transactions and creating a frustrating user experience.

informational Issues | 1 findings

Resolved

#1 informational Issue
Floating pragma solidity version
oMaiga.sol
L2
Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.