Kimchi Info
When the legendary Kabosu passed, she left a void in the heart of the crypto world. But as Dogecoin steps into its institutional era in 2026 with the historic launch of the Dogecoin ETF, the community needed a new face to carry the torch. Enter Kimchi—the "Golden Dog" and the democratically chosen winner of the #ChooseMyShibe contest.
TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io,
is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burning within the contract without any allowances
Ownership is renounced
The contract does not include owner functions that allow post-deployment modifications.
Contract is not upgradeable
The contract does not use proxy patterns or other mechanisms to allow future upgrades. Its behavior is locked in its current state.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Smart Contract Analysis Statement
Contract Analysis
The Kimchi contract implements a standard ERC20 tax token with Uniswap V2 integration, featuring buy/sell taxes that reduce from 11% to 0% after 32 buys, an early buyer whitelisting mechanism, bot blacklisting, and automated tax-to-ETH conversion. While the contract follows common meme token patterns on Ethereum, several areas require critical attention:
Centralization Risk: Although ownership has been renounced (owner() = address(0)), the deployer retains significant economic control through the immutable _taxWallet address. This address can force-swap the contract's entire token balance and drain all ETH from the contract via manualSwap() and manualSend(), with no timelock, cap, or governance oversight. This creates a deceptive trust model where "renounced ownership" masks persistent centralization.
Frozen State: All onlyOwner functions are permanently inaccessible after ownership renouncement. This permanently freezes _maxTxAmount (2% of supply), _maxWalletSize (2% of supply), the bots blacklist (flagged addresses have tokens permanently frozen with no recourse), and _earlyBuyingPhase (if not ended before renouncement, only whitelisted addresses can ever buy).
Dead Code: The _blockedAddresses mapping is checked in 7 require statements across transfer(), transferFrom(), approve(), and _transfer(), but no function exists to populate it — the feature is entirely non-functional and wastes ~8,400 gas per transfer. Similarly, reduceFee() can only set fees to 0 (their current value), making it a no-op.
Ownership Privileges
The ownership of the contract has been renounced (owner() = address(0)). However, the deployer retains economic privileges through two independent vectors:
Via _taxWallet (deployer address — immutable, no setter):
- Calling
manualSwap()to force-swap the entire contract token balance to ETH (bypassing the_maxTaxSwapcap) and send all proceeds to_taxWallet. - Calling
manualSend()to drain all ETH held by the contract. - Calling
reduceFee()to modify final buy/sell tax rates (currently a no-op since final taxes are already 0).
Limitation: Cannot mint new tokens (fixed supply of 1 trillion KIMCHI, no mint function). Limitation: Cannot burn user tokens directly (no burn function exists).
Limitation: Cannot increase tax rates (final taxes are 0%; reduceFee() only allows values ≤ current, and no function exists to raise taxes).
Security Features
The contract implements several positive security features:
Reentrancy Protection: The lockTheSwap modifier guards the swapTokensForEth() function, preventing re-entrant tax swaps during execution.
Bot Protection: The bots mapping prevents flagged addresses from transferring tokens, providing protection against known MEV/sniper bots during the launch phase.
Transaction Limits: _maxTxAmount (2% of supply) and _maxWalletSize (2% of supply) limit buy-side accumulation, preventing single-wallet whale concentration during the initial trading phase.
Sell Rate Limiting: The sellCount mechanism limits automatic tax swaps to 3 per block, reducing the per-block price impact of tax conversions.
Early Buyer Whitelist: The _earlyBuyingPhase mechanism restricts initial purchases to pre-approved addresses, providing controlled launch distribution.
Tax Reduction Curve: Buy and sell taxes automatically reduce from 11% to 0% after 32 buys, ensuring the token transitions to a zero-tax state as trading matures.
Note — This audit report consists of a security analysis of the Kimchi smart contract (Kimchi.sol). This analysis did not include an economic analysis of the contract's incentives or token valuation. The audit scope was limited to the single deployed contract at 0x2b566950BA2298AcEf3c730CC0129b2f4fBd30a3. Other contracts or off-chain infrastructure associated with the project were not audited. We recommend investors do their own research before interacting with the protocol.
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
informational Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Remove safemath library
The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Global sellCount DoS — Dust Sells Block Legitimate Sellers
sellCount is a global counter (shared across ALL users). When the auto-swap conditions are met, require(sellCount < 3) blocks the 4th+ sell per block with a full transaction revert. An attacker can front-run 3 dust sells (1 wei each) to consume all slots, blocking all other sellers for that block. Legitimate sell transactions revert when 3 sells have already triggered auto-swap in the same block. Cost to attacker: ~0.009 ETH per blocked block. Temporary DoS (12 seconds per block) but can be sustained.