KFT

$KFT Coin: Fuel Democracy, Embrace Freedom, and Transform Crypto! Our Ethereum-based memecoin supports RFK Jr.'s presidential bid, with 3% of transactions contributing directly to his campaign. Stand with us for a crypto-positive America, a drained swamp, and a new dawn of government transparency!

Owner privileges
Comments
Ownership Privileges
- The ownership has been renounced.
However, the burn fees will be transferred to the feeWallet which is under the control of the owner because the burn fee is not burned directly and in order to burn those tokens, the owner have to burn them manually.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the KFT Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the KFT team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
32
State variables
public
12
Total lines
of code
1025
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
L909-919
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#2 Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
L911
L1020
Check that the address is not zero.
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
L271-273
L820
L107-111
L216-223
L174-177
L240-247
L192-199
L26-34
L74-81
L88-95
L55-67
L41-48
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 Issue
Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)
L896
L958
Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.
optimization Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
L857
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
L337-339
L345-348
L534-536
L542-544
L559-561
L566-568
L608-612
L630-635
L649-653
L669-678
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.