Itachi Inu Info

https://itachi-inu.gitbook.io/untitle/

Itachi Inu Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

83.61
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

TrustNet DataPulse

Security Assessments

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0xDdf1...e9c1
Network
BNB Smart Chain - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2023/03/21
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burn function within the contract.

Ownership is renounced

Contract cannot be manipulated by owner functions.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


No Audit Comments.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

low Issues | 1 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Contract doesn’t import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)
Itachiinu.sol
-
Description

We recommend importing all packages from npm directly without flattening the contract. Functions could be modified or can be susceptible to vulnerabilities

optimization Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Itachiinu.sol
L320
L319
L318
L317
L306
L305
L315
L316
L328
L314
Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Itachiinu.sol
L298-301
L354-356
L357-359
L360-362
L363-365
L369-372
L373-375
L376-379
L380-384
L385-388
L389-392
L490-495
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

informational Issues | 4 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Itachiinu.sol
L90-103
L59-61
L62-64
L65-67
L68-73
L82-84
L85-89
L74-76
L77-81
L49-53
L54-58
L43-46
L394-396
L23-25
L32-37
L20-22
L17-19
Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 informational Issue
Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)
Itachiinu.sol
L321
L322
L323
L324
Description

Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Pending

#3 informational Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
Itachiinu.sol
L308
L322
L324
Description

Remove unused state variables.

Pending

#4 informational Issue
Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)
Itachiinu.sol
L431
Description

Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.