Illuminati Financial

Illuminati Financial is the first project that invented the unlimited NFTs Farming Protocol for infinite passive income. We have created a protocol thatâs hassle-free for everyone. The most advanced protocol but simplest one that anyone can understand. With just 3 simple steps: Buy Box - Farm NFTs - Token auto staking. NFTs Farming will yield for token $ILLU, then $ILLU will be auto-staked with 666,666% fixed APY for more $ILLU as rewards and then they will be auto-compounded. The rebase time is every 30 minutes. Everything will be automatic, $ILLU holders just need to hold NFTs + Token then you have an optimal compound interest and infinite passive income.

Owner privileges
Comments
- Owner can
- lock user funds by
- setting address to blacklist
- setting maxSellTransactionAmount to 0
- mint new tokens by setting own address as vault
- lock user funds by
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
62
State variables
public
20
Total lines
of code
759
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
medium Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Prevent passing own contract address
L750-752
Prevent passing own contract address to rescueToken.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
L455-465
L543-545
L557-560
L562-565
L567-570
L572-574
L588-608
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#2 Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
L276
L360
L745
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#3 Issue
rewardYieldDenominator should not be 0
L559
Prevent variable to become 0, otherwise this will cause a revert while rebasing
Pending
#4 Issue
FeeDenominator should not become 0
L607
Make sure that the feeDenominator will not become 0. Otherwise it will causes revert in the contract because you are not able to divide by 0.
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
L741-743
L194-197
L110-113
L104-108
L92-96
L84-90
L98-102
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
L82
Remove unused state variables.
Pending
#3 Issue
feeExempt for treasury
L576-580
Make sure the set old treasury to false before changing it.
Pending
#4 Issue
feeExempt for liquidity
L582-586
Make sure to set liquidity to false before changing.
optimization Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
L215-217
L219-221
L223-225
L242-244
L255-258
L260-262
L284-286
L534-536
L750-752
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Diagrams


Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.