HedgeX Info

Hedgex 2.0 is the first fully decentralized platform combining automated hedging and seamless decentralized trading, leveraging the DeFi tech. With 3-tiered exposure and profit-generating mechanisms, it offers unparalleled security and returns. Integrated with tech liquidity aggregation, it provides optimal hedge-optimal rates, and instant execution.

HedgeX Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

31.88
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

"Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review"
Contract address
N/A
Network N/A
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2025/09/15
Revision date 2025/09/15

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner can mint

It is possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burning within the contract without any allowances

Ownership is not renounced

The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.

Contract is not upgradeable

The contract does not use proxy patterns or other mechanisms to allow future upgrades. Its behavior is locked in its current state.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • The owner can set the automated market maker pair address.
  • The owner can exclude wallets from fees.
  • The owner can set the burn tax to not more than 1%.
  • The owner can set the supply floor cap to not less than the supply cap.
  • The owner can mint new tokens not more than the max supply.
  • The owner can take a snapshot.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the HedgexDAO smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Hedgex team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Functions
public

/

State variables
public

/

Total lines
of code

/

Capabilities
Hover on items

/

Findings and Audit result

high Issues | 1 findings

Acknowledged

#1 high Issue
Owner Can Counteract Deflationary Burns by Minting New Tokens
HedgerxDAO.sol
L117-119
L122-124
L127-129
Description

The contract includes functionality to burn tokens through both a transaction tax (_transfer) and manual calls (burn, burnFrom), which reduces the totalSupply. However, the contract also grants the owner the unilateral ability to create new tokens at any time via the mint function, as long as the total supply remains below the initial supply cap. This creates a potential conflict with the deflationary aspect of the burn mechanism. A malicious or centralized owner could allow tokens to be burned by the community and then mint an equivalent amount back to themselves, effectively diluting the value for all other holders and negating the intended scarcity benefits of the burn. This centralization of minting power undermines the predictability and trust in the token's economic model.

informational Issues | 3 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Restricted View Function
HedgerxDAO.sol
L109-111
Description

The getCurrentSnapshot view function is restricted to onlyOwner. Snapshot IDs are not sensitive data, and making this public would improve transparency for governance participants.

Pending

#2 informational Issue
Missing events arithmetic
HedgerxDAO.sol
L77-81
L85-89
Description

It is recommended to emit all the critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 informational Issue
Ineffective Minimum Fee Logic
HedgerxDAO.sol
L152
Description

The logic to enforce a minimum fee of 1 wei (line 152) only applies to transfers of amounts between 2 and 999. Larger transfers that would result in a zero fee (due to low tax rate) are not covered.