Harbor Finance Info

Harbor Finance is a high-performance, gamified DeFi ecosystem that seamlessly merges NFT-based asset structures, sustainable passive income strategies, and immersive financial gameplay. Our mission: to make automated earning not just simple, but genuinely enjoyable. Engineer intricate Yield Items. Harvest $FISH. Collect ongoing incentives. Rise through the ranks as a master-class Fishercat.

Harbor Finance Logo

TrustNet Score

The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.

23.67
Poor Excellent

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

Security Assessments

Select the audit
"Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review"
Contract address
N/A
Network N/A
License N/A
Compiler N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2025/05/05
Revision date 2025/05/05

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burning within the contract without any allowances

Ownership is not renounced

The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.

Contract is not upgradeable

The contract does not use proxy patterns or other mechanisms to allow future upgrades. Its behavior is locked in its current state.

Scope of Work

This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.

The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:

  1. Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
  3. Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
  4. Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
  5. Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
  6. Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
  7. Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
ReferralSystem.sol
  • The DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE can grant/revoke all other roles in the system.
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can register individual referrals (registerReferral).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can register multiple referrals in a batch (registerBatchReferrals).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can set custom referral percentages for specific referrers (setReferralPercentage).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can change the default referral percentage for all users (setDefaultReferralPercentage).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can update the FISH token contract address (updateFishToken).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can rescue stuck FISH tokens from the contract (rescueFishTokens).
  • The ADMIN_ROLE can rescue stuck HYPE tokens from the contract (rescueHype).
  • The MANAGER_ROLE can add FISH token commissions for referrers (addCommission).
  • The MANAGER_ROLE can add HYPE token commissions for referrers (addHypeCommission).

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Harbor smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited the mentioned contract for the Harbor team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Files and details

Findings and Audit result

medium Issues | 3 findings

Resolved

#1 medium Issue
Missing 'isContract' check.
ReferralSystem.sol
L188-198
Description

The contract lacks a validation check to ensure that specific parameters are contract addresses. Without this check, there is a risk that non-contract addresses (such as externally owned accounts, or EOAs) could be mistakenly set for parameters intended to reference other contracts. This could lead to failures in executing critical interactions within the contract, as EOAs do not support contract-specific functions.

Resolved

#2 medium Issue
Centralized Control of Emergency Pause Mechanism
ReferralSystem.sol
L436-438
Description

The ReferralSystem contract implements a pause mechanism that gives the admin unilateral power to freeze all commission claims without notice, timelock, or governance oversight. When paused, users cannot access their earned commissions through claimCommission(), claimHypeCommission(), or claimAll() functions, effectively locking user funds indefinitely. There are no temporal limits on the pause duration, no automatic resumption mechanisms, and no decentralized governance process to override a prolonged pause. This creates a significant centralization risk where a single administrator could prevent users from accessing their rightfully earned commissions.

Resolved

#3 medium Issue
Admin Can Drain User Funds Through Unrestricted Rescue Functions
ReferralSystem.sol
L452-481
Description

The ReferralSystem contract contains a vulnerability in its rescue functions (rescueFishTokens and rescueHype) that allows the admin to withdraw unlimited amounts of tokens without validating remaining balances. These functions have no checks to ensure sufficient tokens remain to cover user pending commissions stored in pendingCommissions and pendingHypeCommissions mappings. If an admin drains the contract, users' claim transactions would fail after their balances are already set to zero, resulting in permanent loss of their earned commissions. This represents a severe centralization risk that could completely undermine the referral system's economic incentives and trust model.

low Issues | 2 findings

Acknowledged

#1 low Issue
Missing MANAGER_ROLE Assignment in ReferralSystem Constructor
ReferralSystem.sol
L70-76
Description

The ReferralSystem contract defines a MANAGER_ROLE that is required to add commissions through the addCommission and addHypeCommission functions. However, the constructor fails to assign this critical role to any address, including the admin. This creates a post-deployment vulnerability where the core commission-adding functionality remains completely inaccessible until an admin manually grants the role, rendering the entire referral system non-functional at launch. If admin access is compromised before this role is assigned, the contract would require redeployment.

Acknowledged

#2 low Issue
Ability to Abruptly Disable Referral Rewards
ReferralSystem.sol
L172-182
Description

The setDefaultReferralPercentage function allows the admin to set the default referral percentage to zero with no lower bound validation, effectively disabling the core incentive mechanism for most users without warning. This creates a significant centralization risk as a single admin transaction can immediately halt referral rewards across the system. Additionally, the function lacks the whenNotPaused modifier present in other economic functions, allowing parameter changes even during emergency situations.

informational Issues | 2 findings

Acknowledged

#1 informational Issue
Floating pragma solidity version
ReferralSystem.sol
L3
Description

Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.

Resolved

#2 informational Issue
Potential Cross-Function Reentrancy in claimHypeCommission
ReferralSystem.sol
L329-346
Description

While the claimHypeCommission function follows the checks-effects-interactions pattern by updating state before making external calls (pendingHypeCommissions[msg.sender] = 0 before the ETH transfer), it lacks an explicit nonReentrant guard. During the low-level ETH transfer via call, a malicious contract recipient could potentially reenter other functions in the ReferralSystem contract that interact with related state variables. The existing implementation provides basic protection against single-function reentrancy but doesn't prevent more complex cross-function attack patterns.