Haddies Bay Club
0x4DBc4a2D36441d3E2CBb515f310aaE0BD7dD49A8 0x4DBc...dD49A8

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

HBC is a collection of 7777 Haddie the 1-in-100-million Cotton Candy Lobster NFTs. On November 5, 2021, Haddie was discovered off the coast of Portland, Maine by local lobsterman Billy Coppersmith. Founder Chief Curator Mark Murrell (GetMaineLobster.com) has a partnership with Coppersmith and became Haddie’s trusted guardian. Though Mark quickly found Haddie a forever home at a local aquarium, he knew the whole world would fall in love with her amazing colors if given a chance to behold Haddie’s beauty
.he was right. Haddie took over social and the news
she was an overnight sensation. Now we’re building a special “1-in-100-million” community around this ultra-rare lobster!

Contract address
0x4DBc...dD49A8
Network Binance Smart Chain
License MIT
Compiler v0.8.4 v0.8.4+commit.c7e474f2
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/05/19
Revision date 2023/05/20
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed

Owner privileges

No crucial issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • Set fees, but not more than 25%
  • Set swap back amount but it must be at least 0.05% of the total supply
  • Include/Exclude multiple accounts from fees and rewards

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Haddies Bay Club token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Haddies Bay Club team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors to do their own research before investing

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

66

State variables
public

9

Total lines
of code

1643

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L1074

L1445

Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L1237-1243

L1245-1254

L1256-1262

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 Issue

Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L983

Description

Check that the address is not zero.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L494-496

L504-510

L523-529

L537-548

L583-585

L593-602

L556-558

L566-575

L441-451

L469-474

L610-630

L106-108

L376-385

L336-338

L402-411

L207-213

L249-254

L261-266

L232-242

L220-225

Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 Issue

Unused return values (unused-return)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L1537-1550

Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

optimization Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Public function that could be declared external (external-function)

LiquidityGeneratorToken.sol

L165-167

L173-176

L1044-1046

L1048-1050

L1052-1054

L1065-1072

L1074-1081

L1083-1090

L1092-1107

L1109-1120

L1122-1136

L1138-1140

L1142-1144

L1146-1156

L1158-1171

L1186-1194

L1233-1235

L1440-1442

Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.