GUS Info
GUS is an innovative project on the BSC network, built by holders, for holders, with peace of mind at the heart of its mission. Every utility and feature is decided through community votes, ensuring that the direction of the project aligns with what matters most to its investors. GUS rewards its holders with BNB while also featuring a self-burning mechanism to enhance value over time. It's a project designed to empower its community and create a sustainable future for all.
TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io,
is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burning within the contract without any allowances
Ownership is not renounced
The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- The owner can exclude the address from fees.
- The owner can set tax/liquidity/burn/marketing/buyback/reward/extrasell fees not to more than 10%.
- The owner can enable swap and liquify.
- The owner can set the swap amount.
- The owner can recover funds and BEP20.
- The owner can exclude the address from dividends.
- The owner can set a minimum token balance for dividends.
- The owner can exclude/include addresses from rewards.
- The owner can set fee and marketing fee wallet addresses.
- The owner can set the buyback upper limit.
- The owner can set the max wallet percentage.
- The owner can exclude the address from the max wallet.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the GUS smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the GUS team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Missing ‘require’ check (Potential honeypot).
The owner can set any arbitrary address to the marketing fee and fee wallet address, Including zero address as this can lead to a potential honeypot if the owner has set the address to a contract address that cannot receive ETH. It is recommended that the address cannot be set to a contract address that cannot receive ETH to avoid these circumstances.
low Issues | 6 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Floating pragma solidity version.
Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Remove safemath library
The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#4 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check).
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#5 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#6 low Issue
Remove safemathInt library.
The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.
informational Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Remove unused functions.
Functions that are not used (dead code).