Green Life Energy Info
At GLE Energy, our mission is to be at the forefront of the energy transition, providing innovative and sustainable solutions to power the world. With a focus on solar, wind, biomethane, and microgrids, we are committed to reshaping the future of energy consumption and paving the way for a greener, cleaner planet.
TrustNet Score
The TrustNet Score evaluates crypto projects based on audit results, security, KYC verification, and social media presence. This score offers a quick, transparent view of a project's credibility, helping users make informed decisions in the Web3 space.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io,
is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burning within the contract without any allowances
Ownership is not renounced
The owner retains significant control, which could potentially be used to modify key contract parameters.
Scope of Work
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
- Specification Review: Analyze the provided specifications, source code, and instructions to fully understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual Code Examination: Conduct a thorough line-by-line review of the source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
- Specification Alignment: Ensure that the code accurately implements the provided specifications and intended functionalities.
- Test Coverage Assessment: Evaluate the extent and effectiveness of test cases in covering the codebase, identifying any gaps in testing.
- Symbolic Execution: Analyze the smart contract to determine how various inputs affect execution paths, identifying potential edge cases and vulnerabilities.
- Best Practices Evaluation: Assess the smart contracts against established industry and academic best practices to enhance efficiency, maintainability, and security.
- Actionable Recommendations: Provide detailed, specific, and actionable steps to secure and optimize the smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- The owner can update the swapper address.
- The owner can withdraw tokens and ETH from the contract.
- The owner can update the transfer, buy, and sell fee recipient address.
- The owner can add/remove the automated market maker pair address.
- The owner can toggle auto buy, sell, and transfer triggers in the contract.
- The owner can update the buy, sell, and transfer fees to not more than 10%.
- The owner can exempt wallets from fees.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the GreenLifeEnergy token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the GreenLifeEnergy team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Files and details
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Improper Handling of External Call Success
In the _transfer function, the trigger() call to feeRecipient doesn’t check if it completes successfully, which could lead to silent failures. If trigger() fails—perhaps due to gas limits or issues in feeRecipient—essential processes like automated fee distribution or tokenomics adjustments might be skipped, causing inconsistencies. To address this, consider adding require(success, "Trigger call failed"); to halt the transaction if trigger() fails, ensuring critical actions are performed. Alternatively, logging an event like TriggerFailed(feeRecipient); allows tracking failures without interrupting transactions. This ensures reliable contract behavior and prevents unnoticed failures.
low Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Missing zero or dead address check.
It is recommended to check that the address can not be set to zero or dead address.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing events arithmetic
It is recommended that all the critical parameter changes be emitted.
optimization Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.