First 100x2023 Info
First100x 2023 is a memecoin that will open the financial market of 2023, with its peculiarities and above all a revolution of our beloved CZ, we count on the popularity of it and once we become popular we will have our value skyrocketed! We will count on several DeFi principles among them some features below our 100x: Mission / Vision & Future Our mission is to bring our investors profitability and above all profit! To do this, we are aggregating applications and trends in one place! We will make the biggest profit of 2023 Our main goal is technology, and with that we bring together DeFi concept, Metaverse, NFT's, AI among others, because technology as well as First100x 2023 is the beginning of a great revolution! The future awaits us, with a fully integrated AI metaverse, conditional on trading possibilities on our blockchain. We will expand our marketing in order to be recognized and respected as our beloved CZ always was and will be!
Overall Score
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
TrustNet DataPulse
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Scope of Work
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges:
- Include/Exclude wallets from rewards and fees
- Set fees but within limitations
- Set swap back amount but it must be at least 0.05% of Total Supply
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
low Issues | 5 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#4 low Issue
Floating Pragma
The current pragma Solidity directive is “^0.8.0". Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using other versions.
Pending
#5 low Issue
Contract doesn't import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)
We recommend importing all packages from npm directly without flattening the contract. Functions could be modified or can be susceptible to vulnerabilities
optimization Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.