Dulion
0x5038E687C34ac6ba02B129dc575eBFe7Ce276937 0x5038...276937

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

In response to the growing worldwide population and its resulting gradual impact on the world economy, blockchain technology became available to transform the digital economy of the globe by way of the development of crypto money through a group of peers. Therefore, we made the decision to introduce a deflationary token with an anti-whale mechanism integrated as well as other criteria to combat rug pull, dumps, and whales with the intention of rewarding its investors.

Contract address
0x5038...276937
Network Binance Smart Chain
License MIT
Compiler v0.8.6 v0.8.6+commit.11564f7e
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2022/07/20
Revision date 2022/07/20
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed
Optimization
Passed

Owner privileges

No crucial issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is renounced Contract cannot be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

No Audit Comments.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

74

State variables
public

24

Total lines
of code

1330

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)

Token.sol

L842

L1072

Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component. Rename the local variables that shadow another component. In this case, ”owner” is shadowing the variable with the Ownable contract’s “owner” variable

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

Token.sol

L901

L910

L924

L928

L932

L949

L953

L960

L972

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 Issue

Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)

Token.sol

L779

Description

Check that the address is not zero.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

Token.sol

L359-380

L319-321

L329-331

L344-346

L354-357

L266-275

L293-299

L238-241

L437-447

L410-419

L426-429

L421-424

L395-397

L399-401

L211-213

L227-230

Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 Issue

Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)

Token.sol

L737

L740

L743

L746

L749

Description

Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Pending

#3 Issue

Unused return values (unused-return)

Token.sol

L1233-1246

Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Pending

#4 Issue

Contract doesn’t import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)

Token.sol

L6-695

Description

We recommend importing all packages from npm directly without flatten the contract. Functions could be modified or can be susceptible to vulnerabilities

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.