Doge Boy
0xCD14250C3685b39F3691226573f10deb0B952731 0xCD14...952731

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

DogeBoy token is a MEME token, a token created for those who unfortunately, being victims of scams, have lost faith in this world, the main target of the project is to give safety to the people who want to invest and to give earnings to the people who lost in the past.

Contract address
0xCD14...952731
Network Binance Smart Chain
License MIT
Compiler v0.8.17 v0.8.17+commit.8df45f5f
Type ERC20
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/01/12
Revision date 2023/01/12
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Medium
Passed
Optimization
Passed

Owner privileges

No critical issues found The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner can blacklist addresses It is possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges:

  • Set bridge contract to a new address.
  • Add/Remove wallets from bots list manually, which will result in the restriction of transfer for them. Hence, this is an indirect function of blacklisting
  • Enable/Disable trading
  • Set AMM Pair, Marketing fee address, staking address, and Fees up to 30% max
  • Include/Exclude wallets from fees
  •  Withdraw tokens/ETH from the contract including the native ones

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

67

State variables
public

26

Total lines
of code

1610

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

TEST.sol

L1169-1174

L1197-1215

L1217-1235

L1237-1255

L1445-1448

L1450-1453

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#2 Issue

Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)

TEST.sol

L1298

L1299

L1468

L1297

L1300

Description

Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Unused return values (unused-return)

TEST.sol

L1412-1421

Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.