Criminal Flamingo Info
Criminal Flamingo is more than just a meme coin – it's an attitude and a lifestyle. Embrace your inner flamingo and join a movement that's as fiery and iconic as flamingos.
Overall Score
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Scope of Work
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership Privileges
- The owner can disable the minimum transaction limit.
- The owner can exempt wallets from max hold limitation.
- The owner can set any arbitrary value in the max hold amount including zero which can simply block the transfer of tokens for the users which are not exempt from this max hold amount.
The ownership of the contract can never be renounced as this contract does not contains any functionality to transfer or renounce the ownership.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Criminal Flamingo smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Criminal Flamingo team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
medium Issues | 1 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Owner can lock function.
The owner can set any arbitrary value in the max hold amount, including zero, which can block the transfer of tokens for the users who are not exempt from this max hold amount. There must be a certain threshold where the amount cannot be less than that particular amount. Also, if the recipient of the token is exempted the transfer of the tokens is possible.
low Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Floating pragma solidity version.
Adding the constant version of solidity is recommended, as this prevents the unintentional deployment of a contract with an outdated compiler that contains unresolved bugs.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.