Boston Dynamic INU
Boston Dynamics is a leading engineering and robotics design company. founded in 1992 and headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. The company is known for developing advanced robots that are capable of autonomous movement and perform a wide range of tasks. Some of Boston Dynamics' most notable robots include the humanoid robot Atlas, the four-legged SpotMini robot, and the bipedal robot called Handle. These robots have been developed for a variety of applications, including search and rescue, construction, and logistics. Boston Dynamics has a reputation for creating highly advanced and agile robots that are able to navigate challenging environments and perform tasks with a high degree of accuracy and precision. The company has collaborated with a number of organizations and institutions, including the US military, to develop and test its robots for a range of applications.
Owner privileges
Comments
No Audit Comments.
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
59
State variables
public
9
Total lines
of code
1565
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
L1054
L1367
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 Issue
Floating Pragma
-
The current pragma Solidity directive is â^0.8.0". Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using other versions
Pending
#3 Issue
Contract doesnât import npm packages from source (like OpenZeppelin etc.)
-
We recommend importing all packages from npm directly without flattening the contract. Functions could be modified or can be susceptible to vulnerabilities
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
L494-496
L504-510
L523-529
L537-548
L583-585
L593-602
L556-558
L566-575
L441-451
L469-474
L610-630
L106-108
L376-385
L336-338
L402-411
L207-213
L249-254
L261-266
L232-242
L220-225
Remove unused functions.
optimization Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
L165-167
L173-176
L1024-1026
L1028-1030
L1032-1034
L1036-1038
L1045-1052
L1054-1061
L1063-1070
L1072-1087
L1089-1100
L1102-1116
L1118-1120
L1122-1124
L1126-1136
L1138-1151
L1362-1364
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Diagrams
Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.