Bitcoin Wif
Bitcoin Wif is stepping out of the shadows of generic, run-of-the-mill tokens that play the endless game of deflationary dodgeball. The era of uninspired copycats is over. Itâs time for the new monarch of both Bitcoin and memes to ascendâ$BTCWIF is here to redefine the meme token paradigm.
Owner privileges
Comments
Ownership Privileges
- The owner can distribute dividends.
- The owner can update the minimum token balance for dividends.
- The owner can exclude wallets from dividends.
- The owner can update the claim wait between 1 to 24 hours.
- The owner can update the last processed index.
- The owner can update the automated market maker pair address.
- The owner can claim stuck tokens.
- The owner can exclude wallets from fees.
- The owner can enable trading only once.
- The owner can update the minimum swap tokens amount to not less than 0.0000001% of the total supply.
The ownership of the token is renounced. Hence, the owner cannot update any settings in the contract.
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Bitcoin wif smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Bitcoin wif team. Other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
133
State variables
public
22
Total lines
of code
1242
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
L572
L572
L610
L614
L618
L622
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
L716-718
L1158-1161
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
L572
Check that the address is not zero.
Pending
#4 Issue
Remove safemath library
L99-144
The compiler version above 0.8.0 has the ability to control arithmetic overflow/underflow. It is recommended to remove the unwanted code in order to avoid high gas fees.
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
L987-989
L8-10
L627-633
L77-79
L81-87
L89-91
L93-96
L128-131
L111-117
L103-110
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
L101
Remove unused state variables.
optimization Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
L906
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
L31-33
L35-38
L154-156
L158-163
L165-167
L169-171
L437-439
L441-443
L445-447
L457-460
L462-464
L466-469
L471-479
L481-484
L486-489
L576-587
L589-591
L610-612
L618-620
L773-790
L817-862
L1016-1019
L1021-1023
L1176-1178
L1180-1182
L1184-1186
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Diagrams
Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.