Azuki Pepe Info

azukipepe.xyz

A unique and stylish NFT collection created by the Azuki 2.0 Developers team. We are an art collection and a complex ecosystem around NFTs. NFT owners can enjoy special privileges such as participating in the Azuki Pepe community, owning limited editions, and even trading on NFT marketplaces.

Azuki Pepe Logo

Real-Time Threat Detection

Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not activated for this project.

This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks. For more information, click here.

On-Chain Insights

Smart Contract Audit

Static Analysis Dynamic Analysis Symbolic Execution SWC Check Manual Review
Contract address
0xcDf6...568f
Network Ethereum - Mainnet
License N/A
Compiler N/A N/A
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Onboard date 2023/07/06
Revision date In progress

Summary and Final Words

No crucial issues found

The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.

Contract owner cannot mint

It is not possible to mint new tokens.

Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.

It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.

Contract owner cannot set high fees

The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.

Contract cannot be locked

Owner cannot lock any user funds.

Token cannot be burned

There is no burn function within the contract.

Ownership is not renounced

Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.

Final Words

The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.


Ownership Privileges
  • Swap the contract's balance manually
  • Authorize/Unauthorize addresses that can trade tokens even when the trading is not enabled.
  • Can enable trading only once.
  • Set buy/sell fees not more than 5%.
  • Set swap threshold amount, but it must be less than or equal to 1% of the total supply
  • Set marketing wallet address, and this is the wallet where the liquidity will be credited automatically
  • Withdraw any tokens from the contract including the native ones, Basically, owner can drain the contract's balance.
  • Include/Exclude addresses from fees.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the Azuki Pepe Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the Azuki Pepe team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors to do their own research before investing.

Scope of Work

Files and details

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.

The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  1. Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
  2. Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  4. Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  5. Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
  6. Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
  7. Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Findings and Audit result

low Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L357-362
L368-371
Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#2 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L126
L364
L373
Description

Check that the address is not zero.

medium Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 medium Issue
Authorized addresses can transfer the tokens without Enabling Trade
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L274
Description

The trading needs to be enabled by the owner in order for regular users to transfer tokens. On the contrary, the owner can authorize addresses manually and those addresses will be able to trade tokens. It is recommended to enable trading during deployment so that this functionality cannot be exploited.

Pending

#2 medium Issue
Liquidity is adding to externally owned address.
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L334
Description

The liquidity of the contract is automatically added to the Marketing Wallet address which is not recommended because, in an extreme scenario, this can be used to drain liquidity from the contract.

optimization Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L192
L193
L199
L209
Description

Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.

Pending

#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L98-100
L105-107
L126-130
L338-347
L380-386
Description

Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.

informational Issues | 2 findings

Pending

#1 informational Issue
Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L218
Description

Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Pending

#2 informational Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
AZUKIPEPE.sol
L192
L193
Description

Remove unused state variables.