ArbiBabySpace
ArbiBabySpace is a community-driven, decentralized Meme token that supports charity causes, for the people who needs , Charity Causes, Hospitals, Senior Centers, Schools, Orphanages Etc... The team will also implement a community governance system, allowing $ARBI holders to propose and vote on "Charity Foundation" where the money from funds to go. Built on the Arbitrum One Network, ArbiBabySpace leverages the speed and low transaction fees of the exchanges to enable efficient and cost-effective.
Owner privileges
Comments
Ownership Privileges
- Include/Exclude wallets from fee, max wallet, and maximum transaction limit.
- Set/Update max wallet, and maximum transaction limit values but within a safe range
- Set new LP pair address
- Update marketing, staking, and charity wallet addresses
- Set fees, but cannot be set more than 15%
- Set/Update the number of tokens to sell in order to get reward to any arbitrary value including zero
- Enable/Disable swap and liquify
Audit Scope
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.
We will verify the following claims:- Correct implementation of Token standard
- Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
- Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
- Deployer cannot pause the contract
- Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
- Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
- Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Functions
public
97
State variables
public
22
Total lines
of code
1053
Capabilities
Hover on items
Audit Details
Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to speciïŹcation and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.
Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.
medium Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Owner can drain liquidity
L1021
The liquidity of the contract automatically gets credited into the owner's wallet whenever the 'addLiquidity' function is called inside the contract. Note that it cannot be called manually but it will be done automatically every time the swap and liquify function is called. Moreover, even after the renouncement of the ownership, this liquidity will still be credited to the owner's wallet.
low Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
L546
L556
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
L680
L679
Check that the address is not zero.
informational Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
L48-51
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 Issue
Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)
L440
L473
L474
L475
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.
Pending
#3 Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
L1011-1024
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.
Pending
#4 Issue
Uninitialized local variables (uninitialized-local)
L888
L869
Initialize all the variables. If a variable is meant to be initialized to zero, explicitly set it to zero to improve code readability.
optimization Issues
Pending
#1 Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
L439
L441
L442
L465
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
L75-78
L80-87
L535-543
L556-564
L566-577
L579-591
L768-776
L778-790
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
Diagrams
Disclaimer
SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an âendorsementâ or âdisapprovalâ of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any âproductâ or âassetâ created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etcâ...)
SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.
SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProofâs position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.