AI-X
0x5f5166C4fdb9055efB24A7E75Cc1A21Ca8ca61a3 0x5f51...ca61a3

Static analysis Dynamic analysis Symbolic Execution SWC check

Join the revolution with AI-X Token, the ERC20 token designed to embrace the power of artificial intelligence and the support of Elon Musk. With no transaction fees and complete burning of the liquidity pool, AI-X Token is paving the way for a decentralized and efficient future.

Contract address
0x5f51...ca61a3
Network Ethereum Mainnet
License None
Compiler v0.8.16 v0.8.16+commit.07a7930e
Type N/A
Language Solidity
Request date 2023/07/12
Revision date 2023/07/12
Critical
Passed
High
Passed
Optimization
Passed

Owner privileges

Crucial issues found The contract does contain issues of high or medium criticality. In some circumstances, the Contract may not function as intended and may pose a safety risk.
Contract owner cannot mint It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses. It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is renounced Contract cannot be manipulated by owner functions.
Comments

Ownership Privileges

  • The ownership has been renounced.

Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the AI-X Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the AI-X team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.

Audit Scope

This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The above token Team provided us with the files that needs to be tested.

We will verify the following claims:
  • Correct implementation of Token standard
  • Deployer cannot mint any new tokens
  • Deployer cannot burn or lock user funds
  • Deployer cannot pause the contract
  • Overall checkup (Smart Contract Security)
The auditing process follows a routine series of steps:
  • Review of the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to make sure we understand the size, scope, and functionality of the smart contract.
  • Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  • Comparison to specification, which is the process of checking whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
  • Test coverage analysis, which is the process of determining whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
  • Symbolic execution, which is analysing a program to determine what inputs causes each part of a program to execute.
  • Best practices review, which is a review of the smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarify, maintainability, security, and control based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research.
  • Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.

A file with a different Hash has been modified, intentionally or otherwise, after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.

Functions
public

40

State variables
public

2

Total lines
of code

320

Capabilities
Hover on items

Audit Details

Throughout the review process, care was taken to evaluate the repository for security-related issues, code quality, and adherence to specification and best practices. To do so, reviewed line-by-line by our team of expert pentesters and smart contract developers, documenting any issues as there were discovered.

Risk represents the probability that a certain source-threat will exploit vulnerability, and the impact of that event on the organization or system. Risk Level is computed based on CVSS version 3.0.

medium Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Liquidity is credited to an EOA

X.sol

L255

Description

The liquidity of the contract is automatically added to the Liquidity Wallet address which is not recommended because, in an extreme scenario, this can be used to drain liquidity from the contract. Liquidity Receiver Wallet Address - 0xC36533602887443e665B47ec64085F49df7a452f

low Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)

X.sol

L162

L313

Description

Rename the local variables that shadow another component.

Pending

#2 Issue

Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)

X.sol

L192-201

L203-212

L278-281

Description

Emit an event for critical parameter changes.

Pending

#3 Issue

Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)

X.sol

L57

Description

Check that the address is not zero.

informational Issues

Pending

#1 Issue

Functions that are not used (dead-code)

X.sol

L32-33

L11

L35-36

L13-14

L23-24

L26-27

L19-21

L16-17

L163

Description

Remove unused functions.

Pending

#2 Issue

Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)

X.sol

L132

L133

Description

Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.

Pending

#3 Issue

Unused return values (unused-return)

X.sol

L248-257

Description

Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.

Diagrams

Disclaimer

SolidProof.io reports are not, nor should be considered, an “endorsement” or “disapproval” of any particular project or team. These reports are not, nor should be considered, an indication of the economics or value of any “product” or “asset” created by any team. SolidProof.io do not cover testing or auditing the integration with external contract or services (such as Unicrypt, Uniswap, PancakeSwap etc’...)

SolidProof.io Audits do not provide any warranty or guarantee regarding the absolute bug- free nature of the technology analyzed, nor do they provide any indication of the technology proprietors. SolidProof Audits should not be used in any way to make decisions around investment or involvement with any particular project. These reports in no way provide investment advice, nor should be leveraged as investment advice of any sort.

SolidProof.io Reports represent an extensive auditing process intending to help our customers increase the quality of their code while reducing the high level of risk presented by cryptographic tokens and blockchain technology. Blockchain technology and cryptographic assets present a high level of ongoing risk. SolidProof’s position is that each company and individual are responsible for their own due diligence and continuous security. SolidProof in no way claims any guarantee of security or functionality of the technology we agree to analyze.