AFFITRUM Info
Affitrum proposes to use AI algorithm and Web3 technologies to transform the digital advertising industry. By utilizing blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized Ad networks. Affitrum can introduce transparency, eliminate intermediaries, enhance privacy, and ensure fair compensation for all participants. The project aims to empower advertisers, publishers, and users, creating a sustainable and efficient ecosystem.
Overall Score
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner cannot blacklist addresses.
It is not possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner cannot set high fees
The fees, if applicable, can be a maximum of 25% or lower. The contract can therefore not be locked. Please take a look in the comment section for more details.
Contract cannot be locked
Owner cannot lock any user funds.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Scope of Work
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Ownership/Authority Privileges
- Launch Contract
- Withdraw tokens and ETH from the contract but not the native ones
- Set Fee receiver addresses
- Set liquidity treasury and distributor address
- Include/Exclude accounts from Fees
- Enable/Disable auto buyback, record buy, and add liquidity
- Add/Remove pair
- The buy/sell fees is fixed at 9%
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the AFFITRUM Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the AFFITRUM team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors do their own research before investing.
Moreover, The actual code of the interfaces used in the contract IJackpot, readDistributor and IAffilBonusPool were not a part of the audit scope and we cannot comment on its security. On the other hand, the distributor address can be used to lock tokens as we don't know the actual code and it can be used to return type(unit256).max
Files and details
Functions
public
/
State variables
public
/
Total lines
of code
/
Capabilities
Hover on items
/
Findings and Audit result
low Issues | 3 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 low Issue
Missing Zero Address Validation (missing-zero-check)
Check that the address is not zero.
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.
This audit encompasses the evaluation of the files listed below, each verified with a SHA-1 Hash. The team referenced above has provided the necessary files for assessment.
The auditing process consists of the following systematic steps:
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash may indicate a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.