PUDEL Info
Pudel ($PD) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) token operating on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). Unlike projects focused solely on farming and liquidity pool acquisition, Pudel aims to mitigate price fluctuations. Our ecosystem is designed to foster a stable and secure environment for our token holders.
Real-Time Threat Detection
Real-time threat detection, powered by Cyvers.io, is currently not
activated
for this project.
This advanced feature provides continuous monitoring and instant alerts to safeguard your assets from potential security threats. Real-time detection enhances your project's security by proactively identifying and mitigating risks.
For more information, click here.
On-Chain Insights
Summary and Final Words
No crucial issues found
The contract does not contain issues of high or medium criticality. This means that no known vulnerabilities were found in the source code.
Contract owner cannot mint
It is not possible to mint new tokens.
Contract owner can blacklist addresses
It is possible to lock user funds by blacklisting addresses.
Contract owner can set high fees
Contract owner is able to set fees above 25%. Very high fees can also prevent token transfer.
Token transfer can be locked
Owner can lock user funds with owner functions.
Token cannot be burned
There is no burn function within the contract.
Ownership is not renounced
Contract can be manipulated by owner functions.
Final Words
The following provides a concise summary of the audit report, accompanied by insightful comments from the auditor. This overview captures the key findings and observations, offering valuable context and clarity.
Scope of Work
Files and details
This audit covered the following files listed below with a SHA-1 Hash. The Team mentioned above provided us with the files that need to be evaluated.
- Review the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof to ensure we understand the smart contract's size, scope, and functionality.
- Manual review of code, which is the process of reading source code line-by-line in an attempt to identify potential vulnerabilities.
- Specification comparison checks whether the code does what the specifications, sources, and instructions provided to SolidProof describe.
- Test coverage analysis determines whether the test cases are actually covering the code and how much code is exercised when we run those test cases.
- Symbolic execution is analyzing a program to determine what inputs cause each part of a program to execute.
- Based on the established industry and academic practices, recommendations, and research, best practices review smart contracts to improve efficiency, effectiveness, clarity, maintainability, security, and control.
- Specific, itemized, actionable recommendations to help you take steps to secure your smart contracts.
A file with a different Hash has been intentionally or otherwise modified after the security review. A different Hash could be (but not necessarily) an indication of a changed condition or potential vulnerability that was not within the scope of this review.
Findings and Audit result
low Issues | 3 findings
Pending
#1 low Issue
Local variables shadowing (shadowing-local)
Rename the local variables that shadow another component.
Pending
#2 low Issue
Missing Events Arithmetic (events-maths)
Emit an event for critical parameter changes.
Pending
#3 low Issue
State Variable Visibility not set
It is the best practice to set the visibility of state variables explicitly
medium Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 medium Issue
Liquidity will be credited to an EOA
The liquidity of the contract is automatically added to the owner's address which is not recommended because, in an extreme scenario, this can be used to drain liquidity from the contract.
Pending
#2 medium Issue
Fees can be 100% or more
The owner can set the tax fee up to 100% or more and if done so then it may lead to the loss of user funds
optimization Issues | 2 findings
Pending
#1 optimization Issue
State variables that could be declared constant (constable-states)
Add the `constant` attributes to state variables that never change.
Pending
#2 optimization Issue
Public function that could be declared external (external-function)
Use the `external` attribute for functions never called from the contract.
informational Issues | 4 findings
Pending
#1 informational Issue
Functions that are not used (dead-code)
Remove unused functions.
Pending
#2 informational Issue
Function initializing state variables (function-init-state)
Remove any initialization of state variables via non-constant state variables or function calls. If variables must be set upon contract deployment, locate initialization in the constructor instead.
Pending
#3 informational Issue
Unused state variables (unused-state)
Remove unused state variables.
Pending
#4 informational Issue
Unused return values (unused-return)
Ensure that all the return values of the function calls are used.
Ownership Privileges
Note - This Audit report consists of a security analysis of the PUDEL Token smart contract. This analysis did not include functional testing (or unit testing) of the contract’s logic. Moreover, we only audited one token contract for the PUDEL team, other contracts associated with the project were not audited by our team. We recommend investors to do their research before investing.